Hela vs Enchantress: Where DCEU Went Wrong

It’s amazing to think that even though the Marvel Cinematic Universe began in 2008, this year (2017) is the first wherein the MCU has presented a female villain after nine years. In contrast, the DC Extended Universe started in just 2013, making it five years younger than the MCU and with a female villain in theaters after only three years. Despite being far younger, the DCEU has provided multiple female villains, as well as a stand-alone heroine film–something that the MCU has not accomplished yet–the first heroine movie will appear in the MCU after eleven years!

 

WW vs CM

The only two female-led films in either DCEU (2017) and MCU (2019)

 

 

Villainesses

The DCEU actually boasts the greatest amount of female villains, especially if you include morally flexible Amanda Waller 

 

Even with these accomplishments, DCEU has struggled to create a strong villain that resonates with the audience. MCU isn’t much better, with the most charismatic villain of note being Loki from the Thor franchise and many others being very forgettable.

 

malekith

Thor 2 villain: Whats-His-Face / Phantom of the Opera Fanboy

 

But despite being outstripped in volume by DCEU for representation, the MCU has once again provided a more interesting villain than their counterpart for a stand-alone villainess: Hela.

 

Enchantress Hela spoilers.jpg

Warning: Female Villains are also statistically long-haired, magical brunettes with raccoon-eyes

 

Here is a quick rundown of just how remarkably similar these characters are despite coming from two separate comic universes:

Former prisoner Hela comes in as a strong threat and just gets stronger, easily destroying everything in her path with her magical abilities and an army of slaves. With this army of enchanted slaves made from her victims, she plans on conquering civilizations.

Enchantress starts off a prisoner in the beginning, and then eventually turning into a magical goddess with an army of slaves. With her army of magically enchanted slaves made up of her victims, Enchantress plans on conquering civilizations.

Despite these strong similarities, the audience never really sees Enchantress actively using much violence. Instead, her brother is a source of violence, as well as her slaves. Because of this, Enchantress feels like much less of a threat and more like an evil belly dancer. What a waste!

 

Tangible Threat

Probably the biggest single complaint about the Suicide Squad movie is how muddled Enchantress’ motive is expressed. In the film, she falls into the trope of manifesting a beam of light in the sky that is apparently bad and might destroy technology–somehow. This generic super-villain trope is an Achilles heel for the genre at large, and additionally why many critics fail to take these films seriously. Additionally, the poor explanation for Enchantress creating the beam of light smacks of lazy writing.

 

beam in sky.jpg

If these weren’t labeled, I’m not 100% sure I could tell them all apart. (Topmost: Suicide Squad)

In contrast, it is established very early that Hela is equal to Odin and his progeny in strength and has no apparent weakness, as well as taking away the signature weapon from the main character Thor and easily disposing of the strongest Asgardian heroes that stand in her way. This show of strength is not paralleled in the earlier film Suicide Squad with the Enchantress.

Hela on the other hand, comes off as a very magical being, actively using spells often, as well as being consistently violent in a way that makes it clear that she is a threat to everyone around her. Remember, both of these characters are very old, very magical beings that have been imprisoned previously for thousands of years, that are known to act as malevolent conquerers. However, only Hela gives off that vibe.

So in short, what Suicide Squad could have done to create real tension would be to show the more violent, lethal and evil tendencies of Enchantress rather than the angsty belly-dancer they gave the audience.

 

 

Realistic Resolution

Another huge problem (other than many plot holes) with Enchantress’ character is how easily she is dispatched. Honestly, as an ancient goddess of incredible power, a little stab from a gymnast-psychiatrist anti-hero should not have been enough to stop her.

Let’s just look at it this way: her living heart had been cut out from her body, and yet stayed functional for thousands of years. Logically, the conclusion can be drawn that her heart is not really that weak against cutting. So, for many viewers this sudden end felt unsatisfying.

 

Heart-shaped box

For those of you who don’t know, that’s a Thermite bomb next to her  heart that was cut out of her chest thousands of years ago–a bit more destructive than a katana

 

In comparison, Hela was simply too powerful to be defeated by Thor, even when he has extremely powerful allies to assist him. In fact, Thor essentially had to throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bath-water in order to temporarily defeat Hela by resurrecting a god-killing demon (who also wants to kill him) in an even more powerful form that ends up destroying the entire flat-planet of Asgard.

Honestly, recognizing that he was not strong enough and surrendering his pride to a greater power to defeat Hela was far more believable.

To that end, it would have been far better to see the Enchantress be dispatched by either a greater magical force (for which in the comics there is a precedent) or completely unleashing the demon within the only other magical character: Diablo. Just as much as Suicide Squad wasted Enchantress’ potential, they did even worse by Diablo. Since they were adjusting origins for characters, it would have been easy to make Diablo a counterpart to Enchantress. It could have easily been magical Middle-Eastern goddess vs fiery Aztec god. It would have been even better if Diablo had been able to help June Moone take control of Enchantress much like he had control over his demon side.

 

diablo final form

Aztec Fire God? Check!

 

Villains and World Building

To put it simply, Suicide Squad created a very narrow world in an already small cinematic universe, whereas Thor 3 vastly expanded and connected the cinematic universe even more. Often villains are the tools used to force characters into expanding their knowledge and experience of the world, but in Suicide Squad it was hard to feel like anything that happened in that movie affected the cinematic universe. And realistically, there is no mention of the huge amount of city-wide damage from Suicide Squad referenced in any other DCEU film.

Villains as a catalyst for expansion, and forcing a change in characters can make stories much livelier and rich. And in this instance, Suicide Squad squandered the rich history of their first magical character and the repercussions that should have followed her introduction.

The introduction of Hela led to memorable growth and drastic, permanent change in the MCU and overall growth and expansion of her cinematic universe.

 

Conclusion

It’s hard to not draw comparisons between these two characters and how important it can be to create scenarios wherein villains truly threaten the existence of the other characters. Realistically, there is a good chance that audiences will see both of these villains again in the future. In either film, the defeat is at best a set-back or questionable and left on a cliff-hanger. I know for sure that Hela will return, as her role as the goddess of death is significant to Thanos and his motivations. It also seems likely that Enchantress will return, due to her file inclusion in the papers handed from Amanda Waller to Bruce Wayne/Batman.

 

bruce gets june

They don’t keep files on the “dead” for posterity

 

What I hope is that the next time we see Enchantress in the theater, that the DCEU will have taken a few notes from the successful introduction of Hela. Will DCEU ever learn how to use villains? Will we see either of these villains again in the future? Or will Suicide Squad simply disappear into history as a failed experiment? Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Trying to Remain Unbiased Thor: Ragnarok Edition

Possible SPOILERS ahead!!

I am fully aware that as an established Marvel Cinematic Universe fan, I already have a positive bias towards any of their movies. What is interesting about the MCU is that the general consensus from viewers is that the Thor franchise has the untenable position of being the red-headed-step-child of the MCU.

 

red haid harry potter.jpg

Though not this redhead, I did actually lose my virginity to one. (mine was a year older, not younger.. and also not British)

 

But, for all of its faults, it actually commits no egregious sins beyond what other far more popular MCU films have been allowed to make. Now, there are many reasons why Thor is treated more harshly than other MCU films, but I feel that it likely comes down to more established deuteragonists than other films that usually maintain a single protagonist.  To that end, Jane Foster and Thor Odinson experience more dynamic character arcs than any other romantic pair in the MCU.

Do I think this means that the Thor franchise did “worse” due to more feminist subtexts? Well, I don’t think the situation is that clear cut, but I do think that may have been a factor.

Going further, there has been controversy against the Thor franchise in the comic world due to Thor Odinson losing the ability to wield Mjolnir and Jane Foster actually becoming the new Thor, God of Thunder.

 

All New thor.jpg

Loved the comic, and the new costume for both Thor and Odinson are amazing!

In all honesty, the change brought a breath of fresh air to the comic series as well as giving real problems to a character who is otherwise literally a God. If you haven’t read it, check it out. However, I can totally see how trying to bridge what is happening in the MCU and in the comics can be confusing. And I can see how old aficionados could be put-off by changing so much of the Thor comics for it to fit better into the logic of the MCU.

All that being said, I actually enjoy the Thor movies (yes even Dark World). This is the one and arguably only superhero franchise that has managed to give us a villain that audiences equally love and hate: Loki. DCEU certainly has not been able to manage any villain to equal popularity–even though they had ample opportunity with Enchantress, yet somehow managed to instead neuter her as a villain and make her bland. Yes, I’m still sore over Suicide Squad–more like Suicide Squandered Chance to Overtake the MCU.

So it was disconcerting to hear from a friend of mine who got an early viewing while in the UK that the movie–though very pretty–was very hasty and the beginning of the movie seemed to be haphazardly thrown together.

 

Thor rainbow.jpeg

I’m looking at you purple, don’t let me down!

 

Bad preliminary aside, the information that I gleaned was all second hand and I have not actually seen the movie yet myself. I don’t make a huge effort to stay away from reviews anyway because I am skeptical at best and at worst, defiant. So, despite all the misgivings in regards to previous Thor movies, and poor plot construction, you better believe my butt will be in a seat opening weekend.

And not just to see the latest Stan Lee Cameo.

 

funko stan lee

These just came out at Walmart and I kinda need them all…

 

What are your thoughts about the upcoming Thor: Ragnarok movie? Think it will fly or flop? Leave your thoughts in the comment section below.

 

DCEU vs MCU November 2017 Edition

I am totally looking forward to the two upcoming movies Justice League (DCEU) and Thor: Ragnarok (MCU).  From what we’ve seen historically, there is sure to be some parallels between the two movies that are both being advertised with the premise of “superheroes team up to take on an otherworldly villain”.

Honestly, I am looking forward to both but I would be lying if I were to not include that Wonder Woman is 90% of why I am even bothering to see Justice League when it comes out in theaters (instead of Amazon Prime).

not sponsored

Amazon I love you, sponsor me in the future

What I’m hoping for, however, is to be utterly surprised by how different these movies actually are (Please no “Armageddon” vs “Deep Impact” situation here) and to see some interesting storytelling. I’m hoping neither of them fall into formulaic plot lines that become boring and predictabl–because, at the end of the day I am still a fan of both of these huge cinematic universes and I want to see them succeed.

Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below, and whether or not you’ll be watching, both, neither or just one of these movies.

The Long Break

It has been 9 months since my last post.

There are sometimes in my life where there is simply too much going on and I get overwhelmed. This has been one of those times. I haven’t been allowing enough time for myself, and I’ve been neglecting the things that make me happy–like making nerdy blogs.

Well, here is my effort to get out of my funk and back into my habit.

Miraculous Ladybug Origins: Hawkmoth

Hello everyone, I was working on this theory back in September, but never quite got around to drafting it up. This theory is about the animated French TV series Miraculous Ladybug.  I have been watching the English dubbed version, however, because I do not know French.

 

title card.jpg

French cartoon feature an Asian female lead? Sweet!

 

Here is a quick rundown of the show: The main characters are Marinette Dupain-Cheng (AKA Ladybug) and Adrien Agreste (AKA Chat Noir). Marinette is the stereotypical “adorkable” manic-pixie character who is very clumsy and not very self-confident. Adrien, on the other hand, is a charismatic and extremely handsome fashion model. They are both given magical jewelry (AKA a “Miraculous”) that is Chinese in origin that is connected to a spirit (AKA Kwami) that looks like a stuffed animal.

 

sacred box.png

Miraculous Jewelry box with Chat Noir, Ladybug, Peacock, Turtle and Hawkmoth/Butterfly jewels missing

 

When they activate the jewelry, the spirits are drawn inside the jewelry and transforms their clothes into a magical costume that cannot be removed until the jewelry is deactivated. As they develop into a super-hero team, they also grow as people in their regular lives and Marinette often learns a lesson that directly applies to her normal life. 
The Adversary they fight is Hawkmoth, who often sends out his acolytes to disrupt the daily life of Parisian citizens rather than doing anything himself. He has the ability to create super villains via a process known as “akumatizing” normal people. Additionally, we never see this character without his mask.

Ok, now that we have a firm base, let’s get into the theory SPOILERS AHEAD

  1. Who is Hawkmoth?

Let’s just break this down on a very practical nature. Thankfully, due to this being an animation it can be fairly confidently declared that Hawkmoth is the alter ego of Adrien’s Agreste’s father: Gabriel. Proof? Well other than structural similarities, including the wearing of a ring–both of these characters are voiced by the same voice actor Keith Silverstein. Additionally, Keith makes no attempts to differentiate between these voices, so it is not a significant leap to connect these two identities as being the same character. 

 

Hawk_Moth_pic_1.png

No one will ever guess that this fashionable villain is a fashion designer!

Additionally, the series makes no attempt to keep this connection secret. See below where the characters wear the same ring I have mentioned, as well as gaze upon the image of the same woman: Gabriel’s dead wife.

 

ring gabriel.jpeg

An atypical simple ring for a fashion designer.

gabriel and wife.jpeg

Zero effort to make the connection secret.

 

2. Knowledge is Power

 

old man.png

Some of the tropes in this series are painful. See “Wise Old Asian Man” above. 

 

In the series, Hawkmoth is the most knowledgeable consistent character in the series. The only one who seems to know more than him is the old man who acts as a guardian to the miraculous jewelry that does not have an owner. This would seem to indicate that he may have been a student of the as-of-yet unnamed Guardian. Additionally, it is also revealed that Gabriel/Hawkmoth is in possession of a tome that was stolen from the Guardian. The tome itself contains information on all the powers and secrets of the Miraculous jewels.

 

book of heros.jpg

Book of Heroes

 

Having this information on hand, not only gives him a leg up on the protagonists, but would also allow him to understand the other Kwami associated with the Miraculous jewels. In the only episode that we see Hawkmoth talking to his Kwami, hawkmoth says “I found you, Nuru.” Indicating that he had knowledge of the Miraculous jewels and actively sought out the moth jewel. The moth jewel incidentally is a locket that Gabriel placed a picture of his beloved dead wife inside.

3. Miraculous Business

We learn in the series that the members of society that own Miraculous jewelry are meant to be heroic. So why then is Hawkmoth evil?

Hold on to your hats, because we’re going to be making a few theorizing leaps.

I don’t think that Gabriel was given the moth jewel, in fact he directly states that he found the jewel. However, because he is knowledgeable, and because he has possession of the stolen tome and the peacock pendant, he was likely the student of the guardian who gives away the Ladybug and Chat Noir jewels. I think it is far more likely that Gabriel was at first the possessor of the Kwami for the Peacock.

miraculous chart.jpg

Why the peacock? Not only is the peacock a specifically male animal, it is also associated with power and beauty–the perfect match for the fashion designer/powerhouse Gabriel.

In the hidden cabinet behind the painting of his wife, we see that Gabriel has possession keeps photos of his wife hidden inside, as well as the tome and the peacock pendant.

 

peacock pin.jpg

Symbolically shelving his previous identity.

 

Additionally, the hotel in Tibet is likely a call back to the origin of the jewels, as well as a potential link to where he first met his wife as a much younger designer. Right now, China considers Tibet to under their control, even as Tibet itself claims independence.

Though it is not concrete, it seems unlikely that a human and kwami would be paired in a way that does not enable matched genders. The only unmatched gender we witness is the forced union of the moth with Gabriel. So given that peacocks are always male (peahens–the females look much different than the pin) it’s far more likely that Gabriel had the peacock originally.

Gabriel’s wife is established as dead, but the manner of her death is never referenced. This leaves it open to interpretation that she could have been the original owner of the Moth Jewel and incidentally died in the line of duty.

Miraculous Ladybug often focuses on the mismatched love of Marinette toward Adrien and Adrien/Chat Noir toward Ladybug. (Don’t believe me? Check out the official song for the english dub HERE).  I feel like this theme was also reflected in the team of the outer circle (fox, honey bee, moth, peacock, and turtle) with the moth and peacock falling in love. Just like with Ladybug and Chat Noir though, the true identities of the heroes would have been kept secret from even each other. This means that Gabriel would have likely not have known that Moth was his wife until her death in the line of duty.

4. Tragic Downfall

 

wife.jpg

Fanart, obviously (making a Whovian reference)

 

Heartbroken with the death of his wife, Gabriel would have likely sought the power to revive her. In the episode “Rise fo Hawkmoth” we are taught that whoever has both the Ladybug and Chat Noir kwamis would become all powerful, and likely command power over life and death itself.

In all likelihood, Gabriel sought out the power to revive her, and when the Guardian denied him, Gabriel tried to steal it–forcing the Guardian to go into hiding. Before making his escape, Gabriel stole the Book of Heroes from the Guardian. Since then, Gabriel discovered what jewel contained the kwami his wife was partnered with. After interrogating that kwami, he found out enough information that gave him the plan to lure out the kwamis of the Ladybug and Chat Noir.

Because he is using the kwami for dark purposes he has also perverted the nature of the power and now creates deputized villains as Hawkmoth instead of the normal power of creating deputized heroes.

Conclusion

 

both

That’s like the only damn time he looks happy. 

 

In conclusion, it is pretty easy to see that Hawkmoth is likely Adrien’s father Gabriel who is driven by the heartache of losing his beloved wife and wanting to return her to life. As the owner of the Peacock kwami, he didn’t have the power to bring her back to life and so instead took his wife’s kwami. Additionally, because of his unnatural purposes, he has perverted the power of the kwami and it now creates villains instead of heroes.

 

too heroic.gif

… heroic.

 

So what do you think? Is Gabriel actually Hawkmoth in disguise? Was the moth originally owned by Adrien’s mother? Was Hawkmoth originally a hero? Or something else entirely? Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below.

 

Who is Rey’s Father?

Hey everyone, Just a short article to get back into the swing of things. This article will be based off the Star Wars movies Episode VII & Episode VIII. As always, please keep in mind that there might be spoilers ahead.

SPOILERS

Probably the biggest question that came out of the movie  The Force Awakens was “who ultimately are the parents of the main character Rey?” Though there is tons of speculation out there, including my own theory that Rey is actually a clone (read it HERE) audiences still don’t know much. Though, the actress Daisy Ridley who plays Rey has indicated in an interview that Rey’s parents were featured in The Force Awakens.  And to be fair, the movie does allude to her parent’s presence as they depart the planet of Jakku.

 

force vision.jpg

Pick up some milk and eggs while you’re out, dad.

 

Some people have theorized on length about this ship, and how it could possibly be a YT-Series ship based on the design. The YT-Series ships were made by the Corellian Engineering Corporation according to Wookiepedia.  Additionally, it is indicated that CEC was subcontracted to make military vehicles for Imperial Navy.

Many people seemed to be hooked on the idea that Rey was willingly left behind, but maybe it was not such a willing affair. Daisy Ridley has indicated in interviews that her parents were not “special”, so that would seem to lead the audience to believe that is likely not related to the main family group: the Skywalkers.

Looking back on where Rey lives on Jakku as a scavenger, there is plenty of post-battle debris from both the rebellion and the Imperial forces. Even as an adult, she plays with a rebel pilot doll and wears a rebel pilot helmet. All these non-verbal clues indicate she had a love-affair with the rebellion.

 

rey helmet.jpg

Let’s take a moment to appreciate she probably took this off a corpse.

 

This indicates to me that she is actually a daughter of the rebellion, and likely the survivor of a battle wherein rebellion forces lost, and her parents were taken as prisoners and their ship was confiscated.

Are her parent’s alive at this point? Honestly, I am inclined to say no, though there might be some chance that they are still prisoners on another planet.

Could Rey’s parents be Imperial prisoners from the Rebellion? Or do you think that she must be a Skywalker–even though we already have a Skywalker for this generation (Kylo Ren)? Let me know your thoughts in the comment section below. And of course…

 

general-leia-organa-2

Your memory will never die

 

Opportunity

Hi everyone!

I got an amazing opportunity to cosplay for Committed Comics at WWPDX. Even though I’ve juggling a lot right now with work, school and family I’m really looking forward to this great opportunity. So please, keep an eye out for any cosplay updates I have for the Committed Comics character “Java”.

See you soon!

java-front_original